- Group 1Lycophytes, Monilophytes
- Group 2Gymnosperms
- Group 3Monocots
- Group 4Woody angiosperms with opposite or whorled leaves
- Group 5Woody angiosperms with alternate leaves
- Group 6Herbaceous angiosperms with inferior ovaries
- Group 7Herbaceous angiosperms with superior ovaries and zygomorphic flowers
- Group 8Herbaceous angiosperms with superior ovaries, actinomorphic flowers, and 2 or more distinct carpels
- Group 9Herbaceous angiosperms with superior ovaries, actinomorphic flowers, connate petals, and a solitary carpel or 2 or more connate carpels
- Group 10Herbaceous angiosperms with superior ovaries, actinomorphic flowers, distinct petals or the petals lacking, and 2 or more connate carpels
- You are here:
- Dichotomous Key
- Cyperaceae
- Carex
Carex
See list of 195 species in this genusCollections of Carex should include basal portions of the stems and underground organs. The basal portion of the plant is important for observing the morphology of the basal leaves (e.g., sheath color, presence/absence of blades, form of sheath upon disintegration). Underground organs are necessary to determine if a species is rhizomatous or cespitose (at the minimum, notes about a plant’s habit should be made on herbarium collections). Collections of Carex that lack mature spikes may not be able to be confidently determined. Some hybridization does occur, particularly within certain sections (e.g., Glareosae, Hymenochlaenae, Phacocystis, Vesicariae). Carex divulsa Stokes was reported from MA by Kartesz (1999), based on Hermann (1954), who reported C. virens Lam. The specimen was stated to be housed at US; however, searches of that museum have not been able to locate a voucher for this report. Carex laevigata Sm. (section Elatae) was thought to have been collected by Greene from Massachusetts near Boston in the early 1800s (Fernald 1911). It is unsure if the plant represents a mix-up in labeling (i.e., the origin was incorrectly thought to be United States) or if this species was truly collected in New England. In either case, no other collections have been reported, and the plant is not included in the following identification keys. Carex comosa ×C. lurida was reported from MA by Sorrie and Somers (1999). The voucher specimen is C. lurida— Fernald and Long 18155 ( MASS!). Reports of the hybrid Carex crinita ×C. scabrata from ma and nh were based on collections of C. gynandra (specimens at GH! and NEBC!). Reports of Carex ×sullivantii Boott were based on a specimen cultivated at the Cambridge Botanic Garden (specimen at NEBC!). Reports of Carex ×aestivaliformis Mackenzie from MA were based on a collection of C. aestivalis—3 Aug 1916, Churchill s.n. ( NEBC!).
-
1a. Spikes entirely staminate (i.e., no perigynia present)
-
1b. At least some of the spikes partly or entirely carpellate
-
2a. Spikes 1 per stem; rachilla often present in perigynium
-
2b. Spikes normally 2 or more per stem (except depauperate individuals); rachilla absent from perigynium
-
3a. Stigmas 2; achenes lenticular to biconvex
-
4a. Spikes all similar and sessile, bearing staminate flowers at base or apex; bracteoles usually absent from the base of each spike
-
4b. Spikes dissimilar and some or all usually peduncled, with staminate flowers borne in separate or mixed spikes; bracteoles usually present at the base of each spike
-
-
3b. Stigmas 3; achenes trigonous to terete
-
5a. Perigynia pubescent or scabrous with hairs or scabrules several times longer than wide
-
5b. Perigynia glabrous (though long-papillose in some species)
-
6a. Bract of lowest carpellate spike consisting of a blade only, the sheath absent or extremely short, usually not exceeding 4 mm (or the bract absent altogether)
-
6b. Bract of lowest carpellate spike consisting of a blade and a prolonged, closed sheath, usually longer than 4 mm
-
-
-
-
Show photos of: Each photo represents one species in this genus.